Abstract

Shark populations have declined by more than 70% over the past 50 years. These declines have largely been attributed to increases in fishing efforts. Despite increased public awareness surrounding the conservation of sharks, three-quarters of all oceanic shark species are currently considered at risk of extinction. Here, we use DNA barcoding to identify shark DNA found in pet food purchased within Singapore. We identified a number of sharks that have some degree of control over their trade exerted under the auspices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), or through their classification as threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The most commonly identified shark was the blue shark, Prionace glauca, a species that is not listed in CITES or classified as threatened by the IUCN, but one which scientific evidence suggests is overexploited and should have its catch regulated. The second most commonly encountered species was the CITES Appendix II listed silky shark, Carcharhinus falciformis. None of the products specifically listed shark as an ingredient, listing only generic terms, such as “ocean fish,” “white fish,” and “white bait.” The vague terminology used to describe pet food ingredients, and in some cases, the mislabeling of contents, prevents consumers – in this case, pet owners – from making informed and environmentally conscious decisions; consequently, pet owners and animal lovers may unwittingly be contributing to the overfishing of endangered sharks.

Highlights

  • The global demand for shark products, such as fins, liver oil, and meat, has caused precipitous declines in shark populations (MacNeil et al, 2020; Shiffman et al, 2020; Pacoureau et al, 2021)

  • Pet food contains shark meat, while squalene is frequently found in cosmetics and other beauty products; in both of these cases, DNA barcoding has highlighted the presence of endangered shark species (Cardeñosa, 2019)

  • Squalene can originate from non-shark sources; DNA barcoding has confirmed that the squalene in some pet food products and cosmetics is derived from sharks, such as the hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), that are listed as endangered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN; Cardeñosa, 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global demand for shark products, such as fins, liver oil, and meat, has caused precipitous declines in shark populations (MacNeil et al, 2020; Shiffman et al, 2020; Pacoureau et al, 2021). Squalene can originate from non-shark sources (e.g., plant products); DNA barcoding has confirmed that the squalene in some pet food products and cosmetics is derived from sharks, such as the hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), that are listed as endangered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN; Cardeñosa, 2019). In both pet food and cosmetics where shark DNA has been detected, the shark was not listed as an ingredient; instead, catch-all generic terms were used to describe the contents. The consumer would have no way of knowing that the purchased product contains sharks without using DNA-based testing methods

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call