Abstract
Sister species that diverged in allopatry in similar environments are expected to exhibit niche conservatism. Using ecological niche modeling and a multivariate analysis of climate and habitat data, I test the hypothesis that the Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) and Gray‐cheeked Thrush (C. mimimus), sister species that breed in the North American boreal forest, show niche conservatism. Three tree species that are important components of breeding territories of both thrush species were combined with climatic variables to create niche models consisting of abiotic and biotic components. Abiotic‐only, abiotic+biotic, and biotic‐only models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) criterion. Abiotic+biotic models had higher AUC scores and did not over‐project thrush distributions compared to abiotic‐only or biotic‐only models. From the abiotic+biotic models, I tested for niche conservatism or divergence by accounting for the differences in the availability of niche components by calculating (1) niche overlap from ecological niche models and (2) mean niche differences of environmental values at occurrence points. Niche background similarity tests revealed significant niche divergence in 10 of 12 comparisons, and multivariate tests revealed niche divergence along 2 of 3 niche axes. The Bicknell's Thrush breeds in warmer and wetter regions with a high abundance of balsam fir (Abies balsamea), whereas Gray‐cheeked Thrush often co‐occurs with black spruce (Picea mariana). Niche divergence, rather than conservatism, was the predominant pattern for these species, suggesting that ecological divergence has played a role in the speciation of the Bicknell's Thrush and Gray‐cheeked Thrush. Furthermore, because niche models were improved by the incorporation of biotic variables, this study validates the inclusion of relevant biotic factors in ecological niche modeling to increase model accuracy.
Highlights
Whether speciation results in niches that are conserved or divergent remains a highly contested question within evolutionary biology
Sister taxa show niche conservatism if niche characteristics were ancestrally inherited and if speciation occurs in similar environments with no ecological selection (Peterson, Soberón, & Sánchez-Cordero, 1999; Warren, Glor, & Turelli, 2008; Wiens & Graham, 2005; Wooten & Gibbs, 2012)
The recently diverged Bicknell’s Thrush and Gray-cheeked Thrush breed in boreal forests in superficially similar habitats, and I expected to show that these thrushes exhibit niche conservatism, as expected if they diverged in allopatry and ecological divergence did not play a large role in speciation
Summary
Whether speciation results in niches that are conserved or divergent remains a highly contested question within evolutionary biology. Sister taxa show niche conservatism if niche characteristics were ancestrally inherited and if speciation occurs in similar environments with no ecological selection (Peterson, Soberón, & Sánchez-Cordero, 1999; Warren, Glor, & Turelli, 2008; Wiens & Graham, 2005; Wooten & Gibbs, 2012). Peterson et al (1999) showed that most of 37 sister taxon pairs of birds, mammals, and butterflies in. McCormack, Zellmer, and Knowles (2009) found that allopatric Mexican Jay (Aphelocoma ultramarina) subspecies show niche differences, these dissimilarities are due to differences in available conditions and not niche divergence These studies, among others, concluded that sister taxa predominantly reside in niches that are conserved over time, and that any minor niche differences tend to accrue after allopatric speciation. Sister taxa that reside in non-identical niches and show corresponding genetic or phenotypic breaks, such as Sage Sparrow subspecies (Artemisiopiza belli; Cicero & Koo, 2012), skinks in the Plestiodon skiltonianus species complex (Wogan & Richmond, 2015), or chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) subspecies (Sesink-Clee et al, 2015), are often cited as showing niche divergence
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.