Abstract

To assess the rationale behind the choice of programs for preference signaling (PS) and subinternships by urology applicants in the 2023 cycle. We emailed an anonymous, multiple-choice survey to the 403 prospective candidates who applied to our institution for the 2023 Urology Residency Match. 121 applicants (30.0%) responded to the survey. 81.8% were in favor of the continuation of PS, with 4.1% against it. When choosing where to PS or subinternship, geographic location and perceived quality of clinical training were the highest-ranked criteria. Racial/ethnic diversity of the residents influenced PS or subinternship choice for 77.8% of Black, 72.7% of Asian, 57.1% of Latinos, and 46.5% of White respondents (P < .05 for Black and Asian vs White). Institutional statements on diversity influenced PS or subinternship choice for 88.9% of Black, 55% of Asian, 64.3% of Latino, and 25.4% of White respondents (P<.05 for Black, Asian and Latino vs White). Females had an increased likelihood of PS or choosing subinternship programs with gender diversity of residents (81.6% vs 33.8, P=.002). A program with PS was associated with a 2.74 increase in likelihood of obtaining an interview compared to programs that were not PS. Of 107 matched applicants, 47.5% matched at a program where they completed a subinternship, and 25.7% matched at a signaled program. PS plays a major role in the match process. When choosing where to PS, applicants prioritize geographic location and perceived quality of training. Diversity of residents plays a major role in recruiting diverse applicants.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call