Abstract

Eukaryotic species are reproductively isolated by sterility barriers that prevent interspecies fertilization (prezygotic sterility barrier) or the fertilization results in infertile offspring (postzygotic sterility barrier). The Saccharomyces species are isolated by postzygotic sterility barriers. Their allodiploid hybrids form no viable gametes (ascospores) and the viable ascospores of the allotetraploids cannot fertilize (conjugate). Our previous work revealed that this mechanism of reproductive isolation differs from those operating in plants and animals and we designated it double sterility barrier (the failure of homeologous chromosomes to pair and the repression of mating by mating-type heterozygosity). Other studies implicated nucleo-mitochondrial incompatibilities in the sterility of the Saccharomyces hybrids, a mechanism assumed to play a central role in the reproductive isolation of animal species. In this project the mitochondrial genomes of 50 cevarum (S. cerevisiae × S. uvarum) hybrids were analyzed. 62% had S. cerevisiae mitotypes, 4% had S. uvarum mitotypes, and 34% had recombinant mitotypes. All but one hybrid formed viable spores indicating that they had genomes larger than allodiploid. Most of these spores were sterile (no sporulation in the clone of vegetative descendants; a feature characteristic of allodiploids). But regardless of their mitotypes, most hybrids could also form fertile alloaneuploid spore clones at low frequencies upon the loss of the MAT-carrying chromosome of the S. uvarum subgenome during meiosis. Hence, the cevarum alloploid nuclear genome is compatible with both parental mitochondrial genomes as well as with their recombinants, and the sterility of the hybrids is maintained by the double sterility barrier (determined in the nuclear genome) rather than by nucleo-mitochondrial incompatibilities. During allotetraploid sporulation both the nuclear and the mitochondrial genomes of the hybrids could segregate but no correlation was observed between the sterility or the fertility of the spore clones and their mitotypes. Nucleo-mitochondrial incompatibility was manifested as respiration deficiency in certain meiotic segregants. As respiration is required for meiosis-sporulation but not for fertilization (conjugation), these segregants were deficient only in sporulation. Thus, the nucleo-mitochondrial incompatibility affects the sexual processes only indirectly through the inactivation of respiration and causes only partial sterility in certain segregant spore clones.

Highlights

  • The biological species are defined as groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups (Mayr, 1942)

  • The results indicate that the cevarum alloploid nuclear genome is compatible with both parental mitochondrial genomes as well as with their recombinants

  • All grew at 37◦C and assimilated melibiose

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The biological species are defined as groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from other such groups (Mayr, 1942). Because of the reproductive isolation, interspecies hybridisation is a rare event in most groups of eukaryotes and usually results in infertile offspring Under this concept, two interbreeding taxa (populations) are conspecific, if they produce fertile hybrids and allospecific, if they fail to produce zygotes (prezygotic sterility barrier) or their hybrids are infertile (postzygotic sterility barrier). The budding yeast genus Saccharomyces evolved from an ancient whole genome duplication event (Marcet-Houben and Gabaldon, 2015; Wolfe, 2015) is an excellent model system for the investigation of interspecies hybridisation. It accommodates seven “natural” species and two highly heterogeneous “hybrid” species of diverse chimeric genomes (e.g., Naseeb et al, 2017 and references therein). The allodiploid two-species hybrids having single sets of parental chromosomes either do not produce ascospores or if they do so, the spores are very rarely viable (e.g., Hawthorne and Philippsen, 1994; Kishimoto, 1994; Hunter et al, 1996; Zambonelli et al, 1997; Marinoni et al, 1999; Liti et al, 2006; Kunicka-Styczynska and Rajkowska, 2011; Pfliegler et al, 2012)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call