Abstract

To evaluate South Asian (SA) and White (WH) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) phenotypes, and to explore treatment approach variations between these cohorts in the UK using the IBD BioResource database. Differences between WH and SA IBD patients were analysed using demographic, phenotypic and outcome data. Drug utilisation patterns and surgical outcomes were assessed in propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts with multivariable logistic regression, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. 30,997 eligible patients were included. UC was the predominant disease subtype in SA (p<0.001). SA were younger at diagnosis (p<0.001), had a male preponderance (p<0.001), and were less likely to have a smoking history at diagnosis. The SA CD phenotype differed from WH, with less ileal (SA 30.3%, WH 38.4%, p=0.008) and stricturing (SA 16.9%, WH 25.6%, p<0.001) disease, but more perianal disease (SA 38.5%, WH 32.2%, p=0.009). More SA UC patients had extensive disease (SA 41.7%, WH 34.1%, p<0.001). In PSM cohorts, comparing treatments, there were no differences in 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroid, thiopurine, anti-TNF or vedolizumab use. Survival analysis in matched cohorts showed no difference in time to surgery (CD) or colectomy (UC), and SA ethnicity was not associated with a difference in risk of surgery/colectomy. Demographic and phenotypic differences exist between UK SA and WH IBD patients, highlighting distinct ethnicity-related variance, and the need for a research focus on under-represented populations. In comparing matched SA and WH patients, no disparity in medical and surgical IBD therapy in UK healthcare has been demonstrated: treatment is consistent regardless of ethnicity.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.