Abstract

Various multiple-disciplinary terms and concepts (although most commonly “interdisciplinarity,” which is used herein) are used to frame education, scholarship, research, and interactions within and outside academia. In principle, the premise of interdisciplinarity may appear to have many strengths; yet, the extent to which interdisciplinarity is embraced by the current generation of academics, the benefits and risks for doing so, and the barriers and facilitators to achieving interdisciplinarity, represent inherent challenges. Much has been written on the topic of interdisciplinarity, but to our knowledge there have been few attempts to consider and present diverse perspectives from scholars, artists, and scientists in a cohesive manner. As a team of 57 members from the Canadian College of New Scholars, Artists, and Scientists of the Royal Society of Canada (the College) who self-identify as being engaged or interested in interdisciplinarity, we provide diverse intellectual, cultural, and social perspectives. The goal of this paper is to share our collective wisdom on this topic with the broader community and to stimulate discourse and debate on the merits and challenges associated with interdisciplinarity. Perhaps the clearest message emerging from this exercise is that working across established boundaries of scholarly communities is rewarding, necessary, and is more likely to result in impact. However, there are barriers that limit the ease with which this can occur (e.g., lack of institutional structures and funding to facilitate cross-disciplinary exploration). Occasionally, there can be significant risk associated with doing interdisciplinary work (e.g., lack of adequate measurement or recognition of work by disciplinary peers). Solving many of the world’s complex and pressing problems (e.g., climate change, sustainable agriculture, the burden of chronic disease, and aging populations) demands thinking and working across long-standing, but in some ways restrictive, academic boundaries. Academic institutions and key support structures, especially funding bodies, will play an important role in helping to realize what is readily apparent to all who contributed to this paper—that interdisciplinarity is essential for solving complex problems; it is the new norm. Failure to empower and encourage those doing this research will serve as a great impediment to training, knowledge, and addressing societal issues.

Highlights

  • Background and AnalysisThe Panel has taken note of the growth in the number and value of tri-council programs

  • Phased growth in reimbursement rates has the advantage of offering time for the granting councils, Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and Research Support Fund (RSF) Secretariat to work with universities and research institutes on mechanisms that ensure full transparency for the use of these funds, with priority given to expenditures that improve the daily productivity and ongoing success of Canadian scientists and scholars

  • The variations in governance, administrative practices, and funding priorities within and across agencies cannot be explained by disciplinary differences or by the needs of the relevant research communities

Read more

Summary

A Note on Terminology

Throughout this report, the Panel uses a variety of terms that should be briefly elucidated at the outset. With the same inclusive orientation, we comment briefly in the report on the complex interplay between basic and applied research Another terminology issue concerns the characterization of different kinds of grants and awards.i The largest group of awards, delivered through well-known programs such as Discovery (NSERC), Project/ Foundation Grants (CIHR), and Insight (SSHRC), covers costs such as research material, small equipment, professional services, travel, workshops and seminars, and stipends for students. One federal agency has placed these latter grants in the “investigator-led” category on the grounds that researchers have latitude to pursue varied lines of investigations within the defined focus, but the Panel believes they are better situated here In like fashion, this category includes direct project funding with formal network configurations and institutional block grants. Evans Leadership Fund Knowledge Infrastructure Program knowledge translation, exploitation, and exchange Leadership Council for Digital Infrastructure Medical Research Council of Canada major research facility major science initiative National Advisory Council on Research and Innovation Networks of Centres of Excellence National Institutes of Health (U.S.) National Research Council (Canada) National Science Advisor natural sciences and engineering Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council National Science Foundation (U.S.) operating and maintenance Privy Council Office postdoctoral fellow principal investigator Prime Minister’s Office postsecondary education research and development Research Support Fund Research Tools and Instruments Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research social sciences and humanities Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council science, technology, engineering, and mathematics Science, Technology and Innovation Council University and College Academic Staff System

CHAPTER 1
Mandate and Consultations
Performance Measures
Findings and Recommendations in Brief
Executive Summary xv
The Four Agencies
Executive Summary xvii
Strategic Clarity and a Multi-year Plan for Renewal
Direct Project Funding
Infrastructure
Personnel
Executive Summary xxi
Facilities and Operations
Executive Summary xxiii
Conclusion
Mandate
Consultations
Funding of fundamental research
Funding of platform technologies
Guiding Questions
Full Range of Disciplines
Programmatic Scope—and a First Recommendation
A Short History
10 Investing in Canada’s Future
Some Guiding Principles
Seizing the Leadership Moment
A CASE FOR SCIENCE AND INQUIRY
A Uniquely Human Activity
Social and Health Benefits
Innovation and Economic Benefits
Ottawa
Canada as compared to smaller peer countries
Output Measures
Sources and Caveats
Publications and Collaborations
Citations as Proxies for Impact
Nature Index
Emerging Areas of Basic and Applied Science and Technology
Talent Development
Graduation Rates and Researcher Density
Highly-cited Researchers and Prizes
Some Reflections on Canada’s Performance and Prospects
History
Function and Role of a National Advisory Council on Research and Innovation
Improving Evaluation Processes
Reporting
Priority Setting
Relationship of NACRI to the Chief Science Advisor
Formation of a Standing Committee on Major Research Facilities
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Cooperation and Coordination
Consolidation or Coordination of the Four Pillar Agencies?
Background and Analysis
Creation of a Coordinating Board
Agency-specific Governance
Agencies’ Mandates and Structures
Membership of Governing Councils
Legislative Review for the Four Agencies
Moving to the Front Lines
Granting Council Legislative Mandates
Allocation of Funding to Granting Councils
Peer Review
Equity and Diversity
Early Career Researchers
Indigenous Research
Third Parties and the Mandate Conundrum
Matching Funding
From Design and Evaluation to Delivery and Resources
30 TCPS 2 – Chapter 9
33 Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada
Building Excellence with Ambition and Scale
Support for International Research
Multidisciplinary Research
Support for High-risk Research with Potential for High Impact
Support for Rapid Response Research
Funding for Research Infrastructure and Equipment
General Research Capital
Digital Research Infrastructure
Infrastructure Operating Costs
Personnel Awards
Training Support for Doctoral Students and Postdoctoral Trainees
Research Chairs for Excellent Scholars and Scientists
The Full Costs of Research
Funding Increase
Costing of Recommendations: A Four-year Plan to Renew Canadian Research
Capital
Full Costs of Research
Balance and Scale
Revised
Funding of Fundamental Research
Participation in international collaborations
The ability to respond quickly to rapidly emerging research needs
Theme 2
Theme 3
Investing in Canada’s Future
Granting Councils
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
Discovery Suite
People Suite
Innovation Suite
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Investigator-led Research
Priority-driven Research
Training
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Insight Suite
Talent Suite
Connection Suite
International Activities
Tri-council Programs and Collaboration
Chairs Programs
Scholarships and Fellowships
Networks of Centres of Excellence Suite of Programs
Research Support Fund
Other Joint Competitions
Other Tri-council Collaboration
Funding Agreements
Canada Foundation for Innovation
Genome Canada
Other Science Contribution Agreements
SUMMARY OF THE CONSULTATION PROCESS
Open Submissions
Community Questions
Responses to Email Solicitation
Roundtables
Halifax
Funders
Researchers
12. Do current federal programs encourage and support domestic collaboration?
Institutions and Administrators
Facilities
Unbundling BERD
Brief Profile of
Overall Funding for Business-facing Programs
Alignment with the Growth Council
Clean Tech
Computer Science Applications
Personalized Medicine
A4.13 Regenerative Medicine
A4.15 Next Generation Genomics
Methods:
Notes:
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.