Divergence of Ethnobotanical Knowledge of Slovenians on the Edge of the Mediterranean as a Result of Historical, Geographical and Cultural Drivers.

Josip Juračak,Mitja Kaligarič,Ivana Vitasović-Kosić

doi:10.3390/plants10102087

Josip Juračak, Mitja Kaligarič + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102087

Copy DOI

Abstract

State boundaries limit human contacts in a homogenous context of a landscape and its natural features, including plants. After nine centuries of separation, finally the two territories in Slovenia share the same political history. In this paper we tried to answer the question to which extent the past political borders, geographical and cultural drivers affect today’s traditional knowledge on wild plants use of Slovenians, living unified in the same political entity. Data were collected using 60 in-depth semi-structured interviews, from March to August 2019, in two municipalities: Komen at Karst and Izola in Istria concerning food, medicinal, economic use, and local customs. The results indicate a quite large divergence in ethnobotanical and ecological knowledge between the two studied areas. In the Komen area, many people still use wild plants daily for various purposes (Taraxacum officinale, Melissa officinalis, Urtica dioica, Cornus mas, and Sambucus nigra). In contrast, this is limited to fewer people in the Izola area and mainly to seasonal use of specific plants (Asparagus acutifolius, Rosa canina, Salvia officinalis, Foeniculum vulgare and Rubus caesius). Unusual for the Mediterranean is the use of young shoots of Clematis vitalba, in the Izola area prepared as omelettes. We can assume that these differences are partly due to minor differences in climatic conditions and partly due to the influence of different cultures and cuisines. In the first place, the impact of Austro-Hungarian eating habits and cuisine can be seen on the area around Komen. Moreover, temporal “layers of knowledge” across the time scale are additionally mixed by the immigration of people from other parts of Slovenia or abroad, or with the influence of local herbal specialists. At last, we conclude Komen area knowledge is alive and homogeneous, and more connected to their local identity.

Highlights

Per definition, traditional ethnobotanical knowledge has been transmitted from generation to generation by word of mouth for centuries and millennia
In the Komen area, many people still use wild plants daily for various purposes (Taraxacum officinale, Melissa officinalis, Urtica dioica, Cornus mas, and Sambucus nigra). This is limited to fewer people in the Izola area and mainly to seasonal use of specific plants (Asparagus acutifolius, Rosa canina, Salvia officinalis, Foeniculum vulgare and Rubus caesius)
The number of taxa cited per questionnaire is lower in the Izola area than in the Komen area

Summary

Introduction

Traditional ethnobotanical knowledge has been transmitted from generation to generation by word of mouth for centuries and millennia. In recent times, it is transferred with written sources or other media sources, which mix the layers of the knowledge in space and time. Over the last few years, cross-border ethnobotany has received increasing attention from [1,2,3], as it is an excellent tool for exploring the effects of different social and political contexts on ecological knowledge, including botanical knowledge. The horizontal transmission of the knowledge might be substantially limited, and in time the once homogenous knowledge might differ

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion