Abstract

The degree of introgressive hybridization between the Scottish wildcat and domestic cat has long been suspected to be advanced. Here, we use a 35‐SNP‐marker test, designed to assess hybridization between wildcat and domestic cat populations in Scotland, to assess a database of 295 wild‐living and captive cat samples, and test the assumptions of the test using 3,097 SNP markers generated independently in a subset of the data using ddRAD. We discovered that despite increased genetic resolution provided by these methods, wild‐living cats in Scotland show a complete genetic continuum or hybrid swarm structure when judged against reference data. The historical population of wildcats, although hybridized, clearly groups at one end of this continuum, as does the captive population of wildcats. The interpretation of pelage scores against nuclear genetic data continues to be problematic. This is probably because of a breakdown in linkage equilibrium between wildcat pelage genes as the two populations have become increasingly mixed, meaning that pelage score or SNP score alone is poor diagnostic predictors of hybrid status. Until better tools become available, both should be used jointly, where possible, when making management decisions about individual cats. We recommend that the conservation community in Scotland must now define clearly what measures are to be used to diagnose a wildcat in the wild in Scotland, if future conservation action is to be effective.

Highlights

  • Hybridization between a native and a non‐native species creates a serious challenge to conservation management

  • This is because hybridization blurs the boundary between what we are trying to protect and the threat

  • This dataset consists of 295 individuals, which have been typed at 35 SNP loci drawn from Nussberger et al (2013) that have been identified as discriminatory between the following two groups; [(Scottish+mainland European wildcats) vs. (UK+mainland European domestic cats)]

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Hybridization between a native and a non‐native species creates a serious challenge to conservation management. A clear issue with estimating wildcat numbers, aside from the challenges and costs involved with monitoring an elusive felid in the field, is the lack of consensus in standardizing a definition and difficulty of aligning the results of different survey methods (Neaves & Hollingsworth, 2013; Yamaguchi, Kitchener, Driscoll, Ward, & Macdonald, 2004). This lack of standardization of methods and definitions makes com‐ parisons between studies to demonstrate population and introgres‐ sion trends impossible. We do this via exploration of the relationship of the 7PS pelage scoring test of Kitchener et al (2005) to the 35 SNP genetic system

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.