Abstract
According to a prominent theory of language production, concepts activate multiple associated words in memory, which enter into competition for selection. However, only a few electrophysiological studies have identified brain responses reflecting competition. Here, we report a magnetoencephalography study in which the activation of competing words was manipulated by presenting pictures (e.g., dog) with distractor words. The distractor and picture name were semantically related (cat), unrelated (pin), or identical (dog). Related distractors are stronger competitors to the picture name because they receive additional activation from the picture relative to other distractors. Picture naming times were longer with related than unrelated and identical distractors. Phase-locked and non-phase-locked activity were distinct but temporally related. Phase-locked activity in left temporal cortex, peaking at 400 ms, was larger on unrelated than related and identical trials, suggesting differential activation of alternative words by the picture-word stimuli. Non-phase-locked activity between roughly 350–650 ms (4–10 Hz) in left superior frontal gyrus was larger on related than unrelated and identical trials, suggesting differential resolution of the competition among the alternatives, as reflected in the naming times. These findings characterise distinct patterns of activity associated with lexical activation and competition, supporting the theory that words are selected by competition.
Highlights
A core process in spoken language production is the quick and accurate retrieval of intended words from long-term memory
According to a prominent theory [1,2,3,4,5], conceptually driven word retrieval involves the activation of a set of candidate words in left middle temporal cortex, and competitive selection of the intended word from this set regulated by frontal cortical mechanisms
A prominent theory of word production holds that word retrieval involves the activation of a set of candidate words in left middle temporal cortex, and a competitive selection of the intended word from this set regulated by frontal cortical mechanisms [1,2,3,4,5]
Summary
A core process in spoken language production is the quick and accurate retrieval of intended words from long-term memory. Previous electrophysiological (EEG) studies examining lexical selection in picture naming have provided evidence for the activation of multiple lexical candidates [8,21] These studies observed an N400 response, which is a broad negative-going event-related potential (ERP) that usually peaks at approximately 400 ms post-stimulus onset [22,23,24]. The decision mechanism that excludes the programme for the distractor from the buffer is assumed to be sensitive to whether the distractor word belongs to the same semantic category as the picture, explaining the semantic and Stroop-like effects in the RTs. The ERP findings in the literature may have provided evidence for the co-activation of lexical candidates, but only a few studies have identified increased brain responses that are analogous to the increase in RTs for the related condition compared with the unrelated and identity conditions [29,30,31]. Response-locked analyses have been proposed as a tool to help adjudicate between the two accounts: ‘‘Additional methods of analysis, examining [...] backwards from naming onset, will be required to determine whether [...] behavioral semantic interference occur at intermediate stages or at very late stages of processing during preparation of the articulatory response.’’ (ref. [8], p. 97)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.