Abstract

In 1998 the issue of Sipadan and Ligitan dispute brought to the ICJ, later in the day Tuesday, December 17, 2002 ICJ issued a decision on the sovereignty dispute case of Sipadan-Ligatan between Indonesia and Malaysia. As a result, in the voting at the institution, Malaysia won by 16 judges, while only one person who sided with Indonesia. Of the 17 judges, 15 are permanent judges of MI, while one judge is an option Malaysia and another selected by Indonesia. Victory Malaysia, therefore under consideration effectivity (Without deciding on the question of territorial waters and maritime boundaries), the British (colonizers Malaysia) has made a real administrative action in the form of the issuance of bird wildlife protection ordinance, a tax levied against turtle egg collection since 1930, and the operation of the lighthouse since the 1960s an. Meanwhile, Malaysia's tourism activities do not be a consideration, as well as the refusal is based on chain of title (a proprietary suite of Sultan of Sulu) but failed to demarcate the sea border between Malaysia and Indonesia in Makassar strait.

Highlights

  • The struggle for Sipadan and Ligitan islands between Indonesia and Malaysia because Malaysia considers Sipadan and Ligitan is owned by Malaysian origin is Sipadan and Ligitan were split over treaty convention in 1891, ie between the Dutch state and the United Kingdom

  • Indonesia claims that Sipadan and Ligitan is an area of Indonesian sovereignty, does not belong to Malaysia

  • Malaysia has been doing construction on the two islands considers that the right to have the Sipadan and Ligitan is right Malaysia this problem could not be resolved by the two parties so that these two islands dispute is brought to the International Court

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The struggle for Sipadan and Ligitan islands between Indonesia and Malaysia because Malaysia considers Sipadan and Ligitan is owned by Malaysian origin is Sipadan and Ligitan were split over treaty convention in 1891, ie between the Dutch state and the United Kingdom. Malaysia has been doing construction on the two islands considers that the right to have the Sipadan and Ligitan is right Malaysia this problem could not be resolved by the two parties so that these two islands dispute is brought to the International Court.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call