Abstract

An important goal of learning analytics (LA) is to improve learning by providing students with meaningful feedback. Feedback is often generated by prediction models of student success using data about students and their learning processes based on digital traces of learning activities. However, early in the learning process, when feedback is most fruitful, trace-data-based prediction models often have limited information about the initial ability of students, making it difficult to produce accurate prediction and personalized feedback to individual students. Furthermore, feedback generated from trace data without appropriate consideration of learners’ dispositions might hamper effective interventions. By providing an example of the role of learning dispositions in an LA application directed at predictive modeling in an introductory mathematics and statistics module, we make a plea for applying dispositional learning analytics (DLA) to make LA precise and actionable. DLA combines learning data with learners’ disposition data measured through for example self-report surveys. The advantage of DLA is twofold: first, to improve the accuracy of early predictions; and second, to link LA predictions with meaningful learning interventions that focus on addressing less developed learning dispositions. Dispositions in our DLA example include students’ mindsets, operationalized as entity and incremental theories of intelligence, and corresponding effort beliefs. These dispositions were inputs for a cluster analysis generating different learning profiles. These profiles were compared for other dispositions and module performance. The finding of profile differences suggests that the inclusion of disposition data and mindset data, in particular, adds predictive power to LA applications.

Highlights

  • In line with the earlier observation that mindsets represent a learning disposition that is relatively independent of the type of prior education and the knowledge accumulated in that prior education, we find that MathEducation, MathEntry and StatsEntry are unrelated to the profiling: profile differences in means are statistically insignificant, profiles account for less than 1% explained variation

  • The application of learning analytics (LA) has had major implications for personalized learning by generating feedback based on multimodal data of individual learning processes, as demonstrated in Cloude et al (2020)

  • The first refers to a time perspective: it takes time for these learning activity based traces to settle down to stable patterns, in specific within an authentic setting embedded in a student-centered program (Tempelaar et al, 2015a)

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Since our goal is to identify the presence or absence of profile differences rather than details of where they occurred, no post-hoc analysis was conducted. We explored how these learning dispositions were related to trace data and learning outcomes. In this discussion we aim to unpack some of these findings

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call