Displaying epistemic independence during mathematical problem solving in small group interaction

Abstract

This study focused on Grade 6 students’ handling of differing proposals when discussing solutions to mathematical problems in small groups. Using conversation analysis, we analysed video recordings of naturally occurring student–student interaction. Findings show that students avoided criticizing peers’ proposed solutions, whereas they either advocated or rejected their own. Furthermore, rejections were immediately followed by conceding to someone else’s proposal, with the concession emphasized through the conceder’s affect-laden embodied actions. Students’ interactional work not only maintained their social relations but also offered opportunities to display epistemic independence. These findings imply that teachers should support students’ argumentation in the mathematics classroom in presenting critical reviews of peer’s differing proposals in ways that are not face-threatening.