Abstract
BackgroundThere is little known about how payer status impacts clinical outcomes in a universal single-payer system such as the UK National Health Service (NHS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between payer status (private or public) and clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery from NHS providers in England.MethodsThe National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit (NACSA) registry was interrogated for patients who underwent adult cardiac surgery in England from 2009 to 2018. Information on socioeconomic status were provided by linkage with the Iteration of the English Indices of Deprivation (IoD). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidence of in-hospital postoperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA), renal dialysis, sternal wound infection, and re-exploration. To assess whether payer status was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, binomial generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were fitted along with 17 items forming the EuroSCORE and the IoD domains.FindingsThe final sample consisted of 280,209 patients who underwent surgery in 31 NHS hospitals in England from 2009 to 2018. Of them, 5,967 (2.1%) and 274,242 (97.9%) were private and NHS payers respectively. Private payer status was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.79; 95%CI 0.65 – 0.97;P = 0.026), CVA (OR 0.77; 95%CI 0.60 – 0.99; P = 0.039), need for re-exploration (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.72 – 0.97; P = 0.017) and with non-significant lower risk of dialysis (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.69 – 1.02; P = 0.074). Private payer status was found to be independently associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality in the elective subgroup (OR 0.76; 95%CI 0.61 – 0.96; P = 0.020) but not in the non-elective subgroup (OR 1.01; 95%CI 0.64 – 1.58; P = 0.976).InterpretationIn conclusion, using a national database, we have found evidence of significant beneficial effect of payer status on hospital outcomes following cardiac surgery in favour of private payers regardless their socioeconomic factors.
Highlights
Many healthcare systems distribute resources on the basis of equitable access to healthcare for people at the same risk [1]
We adjusted the effect of payer status for case-mix on outcomes related to the surgical procedures and neighbourhood socioeconomic status: private payer status was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), need for re-exploration and with non-significant lower risk of dialysis
When the analysis was stratified for elective vs non-elective subgroups, private payer status was found to be independently associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality in the elective subgroup but not in the non-elective subgroup (Supplementary Table 2)
Summary
Many healthcare systems distribute resources on the basis of equitable access to healthcare for people at the same risk [1]. There is little known about how payer status impacts clinical outcomes in a universal singlepayer system such as the UK National Health Service (NHS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between payer status (private or public) and clinical outcomes following cardiac surgery from NHS providers in England. Private payer status was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.79; 95%CI 0.65 À 0.97; P = 0.026), CVA (OR 0.77; 95%CI 0.60 À 0.99; P = 0.039), need for re-exploration (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.72 À 0.97; P = 0.017) and with non-significant lower risk of dialysis (OR 0.84; 95%CI 0.69 À 1.02; P = 0.074). Interpretation: In conclusion, using a national database, we have found evidence of significant beneficial effect of payer status on hospital outcomes following cardiac surgery in favour of private payers regardless their socioeconomic factors
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have