Abstract

BackgroundPatients with mental illnesses face unique disparities in access to liver transplantation. We sought to compare rates of evaluation, transplantation, and post-transplant outcomes among patients with and without mental illnesses. MethodsPatients aged 18–75 with decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files from 2014-2020. Regression analyses were used to examine the association between mental illness and evaluation by a transplant surgeon, receipt of transplant, and post-transplant outcomes. ResultsAmong 274,252 liver transplant candidates, 34,269 (12.5%) patients had depression and/or anxiety disorders and 8,184 (3.0%) had severe mental illnesses. The proportion of patients evaluated by a transplant surgeon was lower among patients with severe mental illnesses (14.1%), as well as individuals with depression and/or anxiety disorders (16.0%) versus the general population (18.5%) (p < 0.001). Similarly, utilization of transplantation rates was lower among patients with severe mental illness (1.1%) compared with depression and/or anxiety disorders (2.0%), as well as individuals without mental illnesses (3.8%) (p < 0.001). On multivariable regression analyses, mental illness remained independently associated with lower odds of evaluation and transplantation among patients with mental illnesses. In contrast, on adjusted analyses there were no differences in postoperative outcomes including perioperative complications, biliary complications, graft rejection, graft failure, and overall survival. ConclusionDespite lower rates of evaluation and transplant, patients with mental illnesses did not experience differences in most postoperative outcomes compared with patients without a mental illness.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call