Abstract

In a recent paper, Steidl (1993) addresses the estimation of earthquake site response, or sediment amplification, when the motion input to the sediments is estimated from nearby bedrock observations. In particular, Steidl compares spectral-ratio estimates of site response to those based on the cross spectrum. By introducing cross-spectrum estimates as the «statistically optimum method» (p. 295) and by stating in the conclusions that «Cross-spectrum estimates should be considered more reliable [than spectral ratios] when the reference site is a single rock station» (p. 299), Steidl gives the impression that spectral ratios are inferior estimates of site response. However, previously published studies by myself and others (Field et al., 1991, 1992a) have reached different conclusions. This discrepancy is addressed in this letter, and an example is included for illustrative purposes

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.