Abstract
In a recent study of the significance of the work of Michel Foucault to the practice of archaeology, Christopher Tilley suggests that, hitherto, archaeological historiography has been written under the rubric of the 'History of Ideas'. In attempting to describe the emergence and descent of the concept of the Neolithic, the author intends to make use of several of the insights provided by Foucault in The Archaeology of Knowledge. The basic element of archaeological analysis is the statement, a function which cannot necessarily be reduced to the sentence or the sign. While diffusionism was to survive as a major theme in European prehistory, it was augmented at the turn of the century by the formation of the notion of the archaeological culture. The culture concept can again be seen as a consequence of the desire to fit archaeological evidence into a totalizing framework, in the case of Kossinna a framework of bounded ethnic units.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.