Abstract

This paper aims at evaluating the potential of the Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methodology for Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) of wind turbine airfoils. The DG method has shown high accuracy, excellent scalability and capacity to handle unstructured meshes. It is however not used in the wind energy sector yet. The present study aims at evaluating this methodology on an application which is relevant for that sector and focuses on blade section aerodynamics characterization. To be pertinent for large wind turbines, the simulations would need to be at low Mach numbers (M ≤ 0.3) where compressible approaches are often limited and at large Reynolds numbers (Re ≥ 106) where wall-resolved LES is still unaffordable. At these high Re, a wall-modeled LES (WMLES) approach is thus required. In order to first validate the LES methodology, before the WMLES approach, this study presents airfoil flow simulations at low and high Reynolds numbers and compares the results to state-of-the-art models used in industry, namely the panel method (XFOIL with boundary layer modeling) and Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS). At low Reynolds number (Re = 6 x 104), involving laminar boundary layer separation and transition in the detached shear layer, the Eppler 387 airfoil is studied at two angles of attack. The LES results agree slightly better with the experimental chordwise pressure distribution than both XFOIL and RANS results. At high Reynolds number (Re = 1.64 x 106), the NACA4412 airfoil is studied close to stall condition. In this case, although the wall model approach used for the WMLES is very basic and not supposed to handle separation nor adverse pressure gradients, all three methods provide equivalent accuracy on averaged quantities. The present work is hence considered as a strong step forward in the use of LES at high Reynolds numbers.

Highlights

  • Wind turbine aeroelastic and wake tools use simplified aerodynamic models requiring airfoil performance data

  • The main behavior is captured by XFOIL, Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and WallModeled LES (WMLES) but they underestimate the suction in the last 20% of the chord; this is likely due to the fact that they do not capture the trailing-edge separation observed in the experiment

  • At low Reynolds number (Re = 6 × 104), Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) of the Eppler 387 airfoil at α = 4o and α = 8o are in very good agreement with the experiment, slightly better capturing the pressure distribution than the state-of-the-art tools (RANS and XFOIL)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wind turbine aeroelastic and wake tools use simplified aerodynamic models requiring airfoil performance data. When reliable wind tunnel data are not available, the polar curves are obtained using codes based on panel method (e.g. XFOIL) or Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). CFD tools use several turbulence modeling approaches, ranging from Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) to Large-Eddy Simulation (LES), passing through hybrid approaches such as Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES) or WallModeled LES (WMLES). The choice of the approach depends on the required accuracy weighted with respect to computational cost, on the flow conditions or on the information needed (average or unsteady fields). The panel (with boundary layer modeling) and RANS approaches, being

Objectives
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call