Abstract

This article discusses the discourse and practice of co-governance in disaster risk reduction (DRR). It is based on an extensive ethnographic study of DRR at global level and in two disaster-prone countries in Southeast Asia: Indonesia and Myanmar. These country cases were selected not only because of their similarly high vulnerability to disasters, but also because the overlaps and differences between them in disaster governance allowed for a comparative study of the impacts of co-governance in DRR. Indonesia is characterised by a longer history with democratic governance institutions and a largely national-led response to disasters; Myanmar has only started to develop DRR in the last 10 years, and its policies are still largely led by international actors. In both countries, disaster response has shifted from being top-down and state-centred to following a co-governance approach. This reflects a worldwide trend in DRR, the idea being that co-governance, where different state and non-state stakeholders are involved in governance networks, will lead to more inclusive and effective DRR. Our findings suggest that, in Myanmar and Indonesia, DRR has indeed become more inclusive. However, at the same time, we find that DRR in both countries has remained highly hierarchical and state-centred. Although the possible gains of encouraging future initiatives among different actors negotiating disaster response is under-explored, we find that, to date, the multiplication of actors involved in DRR, especially within the state, has led to an increasingly complex, competitive system that negatively affects the ability to conduct DRR.

Highlights

  • Disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been organised around an emergency style of top-down, statecentred policies and institutions

  • In 1998, Indonesian political reforms comprehensively introduced decentralisation. This decentralisation has inspired the architecture of disaster risk governance (DRG) in Indonesia, where provincial and regency1 governments have been made entirely responsible for the implementation of the disaster risk reduction (DRR) policy agenda

  • We found that the global trend towards a shift from a top-down disaster response to cogoverned, inclusive forms of DRG is visible in the policies and organisation of governance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been organised around an emergency style of top-down, statecentred policies and institutions. In the ‘living with the floods’ era, the focus of disaster risk governance (DRG) has shifted away from top-down emergency response measures to softer measures, such as improving the ways in which vulnerable populations and their governments deal with recurrent floods and other hazardous events. This implies a shift in governance away from top-down disaster management and towards co-governed forms of response that involve different segments and levels of the state, as well as societal actors

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call