DISADVANTAGES OF USING FORENSIC TECHNIQUES IN THE SYSTEM OF COUNTERACTION FACTORS TO THE INVESTIGATION

Abstract

The article states. that the issues of identifying and overcoming opposition to the investigation have attracted and continue to attract the attention of scientists who have devoted a significant amount of work to the study of relevant problems. The materials of the analysis of investigative practice also indicate the existence and necessity of their solution. Opposition to the investigation is carried out by various actors and in various forms. However, its occurrence is often caused by the inaction of investigators and interrogators. superficially carrying out checks on crime reports. They do not ensure the collection and use of necessary legal and forensic means in establishing their signs, allowing the loss of important information and various objects - carriers of search and evidentiary information, which entails the impossibility of filling in these shortcomings. They are equally obliged to carefully comply with the provisions of the criminal Procedure law on the conduct of investigative and other procedural actions after the initiation of a criminal case, and to make maximum use of the recommendations of private forensic methods for investigating certain types of crimes to ensure comprehensiveness. the completeness and objectivity of their activities, thereby neutralizing attempts to counteract it. According to the author, the organizational and administrative documents of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation should focus the attention of investigators more. heads of investigative agencies. Prosecutors are not only responsible for studying them. but also to make full use of private forensic techniques. Reinforcement can ensure: a) more thorough compliance by investigators. investigators of procedural and criminalistic discipline at all stages of pre-trial criminal proceedings; b) a more competent and demanding approach by the heads of investigative bodies, bodies of inquiry, employees of procedural control units of procedural control units. prosecutors to step-by-step analysis and evaluation of materials of pre-trial proceedings; c) prevention and overcoming of obstacles to the investigation caused by its conduct.