Directional atherectomy with anti-restenotic therapy versus open repair in patients with restenotic disease after surgical revascularization of the common femoral artery.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

This study evaluated the performance of directional atherectomy with anti-restenotic therapy (DAART) compared to surgery in patients with restenosis of the groin arteries after endarterectomy or femoral bypass anastomosis. Consecutive patients with restenotic lesions from two vascular surgery units were retrospectively evaluated. Detailed medical history, type of previous reconstruction, anatomical and perioperative data, 30-day mortality and morbidity as well as data during follow-up were documented. The primary outcome measure was primary patency, whereas technical success, secondary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), freedom from major amputation, overall morbidity and mortality were additionally evaluated. The endovascular (25 patients) and surgical (17 patients) groups were comparable regarding the initial surgical reconstruction, demographics, comorbidities and medication. In the DAART group technical success was 100% without any residual stenosis >30%, distal embolization, perforation or bailout stenting. Hospital stay was shorter after DAART (medial 2 vs. 7 days, P<0.001), while more wound complications were documented in the surgical group within the first 30-days (29.4% vs. 0%, P=0.004). Primary patency, secondary patency and TLR were comparable between the groups (66.7% vs. 64.7%, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.3-2.9, P=0.93, 86.4% vs. 93.8%, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.65-6.6, P=0.71, 68% vs. 70.6%, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.3-2.9, P=0.93, respectively). During follow-up no major amputation was observed, the improvement of the Rutherford class was comparable between the two groups and there were two deaths in the surgical group. In this study, DAART for restenotic atherosclerotic disease of the common femoral artery and its branches is a safe alternative to redo surgery and is associated with shorter hospital stay, fewer wound complications, comparable patency and freedom from TLR rates.