Dimensions of influence in nonprofit leadership coalitions: Contingencies for governance quality

Abstract

We explore the relatedness between different types of governance coalitions and the level of organizational governance quality. We propose two dimensions of influence to classify nonprofit governance coalitions. We apply a mixed methodology, including a comparative case analysis of five organizations and a multi-level regression analysis of coalition metrics on formal positions held by individuals. Based on our observations we formulate eight theoretical propositions, which stress for high quality governance practices the importance of a ‘balance coalition’ between diffused and centralized influences, and between specific and holistic influences. Further, we conjecture the important role of formal leadership positions, such as CEOs and chairmen, in the structure of governance coalitions. Finally, several research paths to scrutinize our propositions in further research are suggested.