Abstract

Combined with the judicial practice of personal information protection civil public interest litigation and the provisions of Article 70 of the Personal Information Protection Law, there is a great controversy between the theoretical and practical circles on the subject of such litigation. Although the existing provisions define the subject of prosecution as three categories: the people’s procuratorate, the consumer organization stipulated by law and the organization determined by the national network and information department, the problems of unclear scope of the subject, unclear scope of functions and unclear order of prosecution have not been solved. In order to improve the effectiveness of the protection of personal information rights and interests, we should clarify the scope of the functions of each prosecution subject, straighten out the order of prosecution, confirm the status of the procuratorial organ as a supplementary prosecution subject, expand the scope of “consumer organizations stipulated by law,” and clarify the conditions of “organizations determined by the national network information department.”

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.