Abstract
Insertion of phenylethyne into cis-[Fe 2(CO) 4(μ-H)(μ-CO)(μ-PPh 2)(μ-dppm)] 1a affords isomers cis-[Fe 2(CO) 4(μ-PhCCH 2)(μ-PPh 2)(μ-dppm)] 2a and trans-[Fe 2(CO) 4(μ-HCCHPh)(μ-PPh 2)(μ-dppm)] 2b which differ in both the regioselectivity of the alkyne insertion (α and β) and the relative orientations of the phosphido and diphosphine ligands ( cis and trans) respectively. In contrast, reaction with trans-[Fe 2(CO) 4(μ-H)(μ-CO)(μ-PCy 2)(μ-dppm)] 1b appears to give only the α-substituted product trans-[Fe 2(CO) 4(μ-PhCCH 2)(μ-PCy 2)(μ-dppm)] 3a, however, thermolysis of the crude reaction mixture leads to the low yield isolation of the α,β-unsaturated acyl complex trans-[Fe 2(CO) 4{μ-OCC(Ph)CH 2)}(μ-PCy 2)(μ-dppm)] 4, formally resulting from Co insertion into the unidentified β-substituted isomer. Reaction of 1a with propargyl alcohol affords chromatographically separable isomers cis-[Fe 2(CO) 4{μ-C(CH 2OH)CH 2}(μ-PPh 2(μ-dppm)] 5a and trans-[Fe 2(CO) 4{μ-HCCH(CH 2OH)}(μ-PPh 2)(μ-dppm)] 5b, while with 1b an inseparable mixture of trans-[Fe 2(CO) 4{μ-C(CH 2OH)CH 2}(μ-PCy 2)(μ-dppm)] 6a and trans-[Fe 2(CO) 4{μ-HCCH(CH 2OH)}(μ-PCy 2)(μ-dppm)] 6b results. Complexes 2a, 2b, 4 and 5a have been characterised by single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. All μ-alkenyl complexes undergo ‘windshield-wiper’ fluxionality on the NMR timescale, with free energies of activation varying dramatically, an effect which can be correlated with the mode of binding of the alkenyl ligand in the solid state.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call