Abstract

In the context of the construction of a digital rule of law government, the digitisation of administrative penalties has been widely used in law enforcement practice, enhancing the efficiency and objectivity of administrative penalties. However, there are certain legal risks associated with digitised discretion: the algorithmic black box contradicts the principle of administrative openness, the procedural rights of the administrative relative are ignored, justice in individual cases is sometimes difficult to be achieved as well as the definition of the responsible subject is vague. For this reason, the risk-building programme should be improved through the construction of a transparency mechanism and a dynamic adjustment mechanism, the improvement of administrative procedures, and the clarification of the subject of responsibilityr.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.