Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performances of the random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR) models combined with different feature selection methods, including recursive feature elimination (RFE), simulated annealing feature selection (SAFS), and selection by filtering (SBF) in predicting soil pH in Anhui Province, East China. We also used the ALL original features to build the RF and SVR models as a comparison. A total of 140 samples were selected, following the principles of randomness, uniformity, and representativeness, to consider the combination of landscape elements, such as topography, parent material, and land use. Auxiliary data, including climatic, topographic, and vegetation indexes, were used for predicting soil pH. The results showed that compared with the use the ALL original modeling features (ALL-RF, ALL-SVR), the combination of the three feature selection algorithms with RF and SVR can eliminate some redundant features and effectively improve the prediction accuracy of the soil pH model. For the RF model, the RMSE and the MAE of the calibration of the RFE-RF model were 0.73 and 0.57 and had the highest R2 in four different RF models. The testing set of the RFE-RF model had an R2 of 0.61, which was better than that of the ALL-RF (R2 = 0.45) model and lower than those of the SAFS-RF (R2 = 0.71) and SBF-RF (R2 = 0.69) models. For the SVR model, the RFE-RF model was more robust and had better generalization ability. The accuracy of digital soil mapping can be improved through feature selection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call