Digit preference and biased conclusions in cardiac arrest studies

Abstract

BackgroundIn cardiac arrest (CA), time is directly predictive of patients' prognosis. The increase in mortality resulting from delayed cardiopulmonary resuscitation has been quantified minute by minute. Times reported in CA management studies could reflect a timestamping bias referred to as “digit preference”. This phenomenon leads to a preference for certain numerical values (such as 2, 5, or 10) over others (such as 13).Our objective was to investigate whether or not digit preference phenomenon could be observed in reported times of the day related to CA management, as noted in a national registry. MethodsWe analyzed data from the French National Electronic Registry of Cardiac Arrests. We analyzed twelve times-of-the-day corresponding to each of the main steps of CA management reported by the emergency physicians who managed the patients in prehospital settings. We postulated that if CA occurred at random times throughout the day, then we could expect to see events related to CA management occurring at a similar rate each minute of each hour of the day, at a fraction of 1/60. We compared the fraction of times reported as multiples of 15 (0, 15, 30, and 45 – on the hour, quarters, half hour) with the expected fraction of 4/60 (i.e. 4 × 1/60). Main resultsA total of 47,211 times-of-the-day in relation to 6131 CA were analyzed. The most overrepresented numbers were: 0, with 3737 occurrences (8% vs 2% expected, p < 0.0001) and 30, with 2807 occurrences (6% vs 2% expected, p < 0.0001). Times-of-the-day as multiples of 15 were overrepresented (22% vs 7% expected, p < 0.0001). ConclusionProspectively collected times were considerably influenced by digit preference phenomenon. Studies that are not based on automatic time recordings and that have not evaluated and considered this bias should be interpretated with caution.