Abstract

Humans are able to modulate digit forces as a function of position despite changes in digit placement that might occur from trial to trial or when changing grip type for object manipulation. Although this phenomenon is likely to rely on sensing the position of the digits relative to each other and the object, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To address this question, we asked subjects (n = 30) to match perceived vertical distance between the center of pressure (CoP) of the thumb and index finger pads (dy) of the right hand (“reference” hand) using the same hand (“test” hand). The digits of reference hand were passively placed collinearly (dy = 0 mm). Subjects were then asked to exert different combinations of normal and tangential digit forces (Fn and Ftan, respectively) using the reference hand and then match the memorized dy using the test hand. The reference hand exerted Ftan of thumb and index finger in either same or opposite direction. We hypothesized that, when the tangential forces of the digits are produced in opposite directions, matching error (1) would be biased toward the directions of the tangential forces; and (2) would be greater when the remembered relative contact points are matched with negligible digit force production. For the test hand, digit forces were either negligible (0.5–1 N, 0 ± 0.25 N; Experiment 1) or the same as those exerted by the reference hand (Experiment 2).Matching error was biased towards the direction of digit tangential forces: thumb CoP was placed higher than the index finger CoP when thumb and index finger Ftan were directed upward and downward, respectively, and vice versa (p < 0.001). However, matching error was not dependent on whether the reference and test hand exerted similar or different forces. We propose that the expected sensory consequence of motor commands for tangential forces in opposite directions overrides estimation of fingertip position through haptic sensory feedback.

Highlights

  • Dexterous object manipulation requires coordination of digit forces (Johansson and Westling, 1988b; Johansson and Flanagan, 2009) and positions (Lukos et al, 2007, 2008; Fu et al, 2010, 2011; Zhang et al, 2010; Crajé et al, 2011)

  • This study revealed that sensorimotor transformations are more accurate for (a) larger vertical separations between the digits’ center of pressure (CoP); and (b) when fingertips’ vertical distance is reproduced with the same hand and at the same posture as those used when sensing the fingertip distance

  • The main findings of this study are that accuracy in the sensorimotor transformation of vertical fingertip distance (1) is sensitive to whether tangential, but not normal, forces of thumb and index finger are produced in the same or opposite direction; and (2) is not sensitive to whether the hand used for matching fingertip distance exerts the same or different forces relative to those experienced during sensing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dexterous object manipulation requires coordination of digit forces (Johansson and Westling, 1988b; Johansson and Flanagan, 2009) and positions (Lukos et al, 2007, 2008; Fu et al, 2010, 2011; Zhang et al, 2010; Crajé et al, 2011). It has been shown that when subjects can choose digit placement on an object, they modulate digit forces to compensate for trial-to-trial variability in digit position This behavior is thought to be instrumental for ensuring a consistent manipulation performance and might explain humans’ ability to perform the same manipulation task despite variability in where or how the object is grasped (Fu et al, 2010, 2011). To understand the sensorimotor transformations responsible for the above phenomenon of digit position-force coordination, our previous study examined subjects’ ability to match the remembered relative vertical distance between the center of pressure (CoP) of thumb and index finger pads without visual feedback of the hand (Shibata et al, 2013). It was proposed that reproduction of fingertips’ vertical distance with the same hand and at the same posture would bypass higher-order processing of fingertip distance

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call