Abstract
Enabling formulations, such as lipid-based formulations (LBFs), are means to deliver challenging-to-formulate, poorly soluble drugs. LBFs may be composed of lipids, surfactants and/or cosolvents and can be classified depending on the proportions of the components and the hydrophilicity of the surfactant according to the Lipid Formulations Classification System, ranging from type I (very lipophilic) to type IV (hydrophilic). In cases where drug solubility in LBFs does not suffice, e.g. for preclinical toxicity studies, supersaturated LBFs can be used in order to increase the drug load. However, the effect of digestion on drug absorption from supersaturated type I formulations (consisting exclusively of lipids) still remains relatively unexplored and unclear. In the present study, the impact of lipid digestion on absorption of cinnarizine-loaded supersaturated lipid-based formulations of type I was investigated in rats by pre-dosing of the lipase inhibitor orlistat. The lipid chain length and the drug dose were varied by testing medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) and long-chain triglycerides (LCT), both supersaturated and non-supersaturated. Due to the physical instability of supersaturated formulations of cinnarizine, i.e. a potential of precipitation of cinnarizine, the impact of the addition of the amphiphilic polymer Soluplus®, as a potential precipitation inhibitor, was also investigated. The supersaturated systems resulted in a 2.3 – 3.3-fold higher Area Under the Curve (AUC0–24 h, not dose-normalized) and 1.4 – 2.2-fold higher maximum plasma concentration (Cmax, not dose-normalized) than non-supersaturated formulations (statistically significant with p = 0.05), whereas the addition of Soluplus® did not reveal any benefit. Results indicated that lipase inhibition affected the in vivo performance of LBFs: Co-administration of the lipase inhibitor significantly reduced Cmax and AUC0–24 h (both to 33–39 %, not dose-normalized) for the LCT formulations and, though not significant, a similar trend was observed for the AUC0–24 h of the MCT formulations (to 53–87 %), suggesting a higher dependency on lipolysis for LCT. Also, tmax tended to decrease to 20–60 % when compared to the animals not dosed with orlistat but lacking statistical significance. Without lipase inhibition, the LCT in general lead to better absorption of cinnarizine as compared to MCT, with 1.2–1.7-fold higher AUC0–24 h and 1.4–1.8-fold higher Cmax, but without showing statistical significance. Overall, the study revealed that lipolysis plays a major role in drug absorption from supersaturated lipid-based formulations type I.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.