Abstract

ABSTRACTPurposeTo evaluate whether the extent of enteric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal abnormality reflects inflammatory burden in Crohn’s disease (CD), and to compare qualitative and quantitative grading.Methods69 CD patients (35 male, age 16–78) undergoing MR enterography with DWI (MRE-D) and the same-day faecal calprotectin (cohort 1) were supplemented by 29 patients (19 male, age 16–70) undergoing MRE-D and terminal ileal biopsy (cohort 2). Global (cohort 1) and terminal ileal (cohort 2) DWI signal was graded (0 to 3) by 2 radiologists and segmental apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated. Data were compared to calprotectin and a validated MRI activity score [MEGS] (cohort 1), and a histopathological activity score (eAIS) (cohort 2) using nonparametric testing and rank correlation.ResultsPatients with normal (grades 0 and 1) DWI signal had lower calprotectin and MEGS than those with abnormal signal (grades 2 and 3) (160 vs. 492 μg/l, p = 0.0004, and 3.3 vs. 21, p < 0.0001), respectively. Calprotectin was lower if abnormal DWI affected <10 cm of small bowel compared to diffuse small and large bowel abnormality (236 vs. 571 μg, p = 0.009). The sensitivity and specificity for active disease (calprotectin > 120 μg/l) were 83% and 52%, respectively. There was a negative correlation between ileal MEGS and ADC (r = −0.41, p = 0.017). There was no significant difference in eAIS between qualitative DWI scores (p = 0.42). Mean ADC was not different in those with and without histological inflammation (2077 vs. 1622 × 10−6mm2/s, p = 0.10)ConclusionsQualitative grading of DWI signal has utility in defining the burden of CD activity. Quantitative ADC measurements have poor discriminatory ability for segmental disease activity.

Highlights

  • To evaluate whether the extent of enteric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal abnormality reflects inflammatory burden in Crohn’s disease (CD), and to compare qualitative and quantitative grading

  • This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of subjective grading of DWI signal and objective measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in grading of Crohn’s disease activity using a range of segmental and global standards of reference

  • We found faecal calprotectin levels were significantly greater when enteric DWI was abnormal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To evaluate whether the extent of enteric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal abnormality reflects inflammatory burden in Crohn’s disease (CD), and to compare qualitative and quantitative grading. Global (cohort 1) and terminal ileal (cohort 2) DWI signal was graded (0 to 3) by 2 radiologists and segmental apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated. While DWI may be a rapid and accurate method to stage gastrointestinal inflammation overall, its utility as a global marker of activity has not been validated. It is unclear whether simple qualitative grading of signal on DWI images is as effective as more time-consuming quantitative measurements (e.g., apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] calculation)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call