Abstract
Purpose:the main objective of this article is to understand the need to formulate and then apply a single approach to strategic planning for industrial development of regions, which allows more rationally approaching strategic development planning, as separate regions and territories of the Russian Federation, and individual industries, taking into account their level of modern economic and social development, as well as their provision with various types of resources. To achieve this goal in the article it is necessary to solve the following tasks: to identify the features of management of industrial complexes in the region, to analyze the dynamics and unevenness of industrial development in key regions of Russia, to substantiate the objective necessity of targeted formation of recommendations on their industrial development.Methods:this article is written using a systematic, functional, comparative, structural, interdisciplinary approach, as well as macro and microeconomic analysis tools applied to the development of the regional industrial sector of the economy.Results:the article forms the idea of the expediency of applying a synthetic approach to the classification of Russian regions, which makes it possible to group the regions on the basis of quantitative indicators of social and economic development and qualitative indicators of institutional development, as well as long-term development factors of the region under consideration, taking into account the structure of the dominant industries. The presented dynamics of the development of the regions shows the unevenness of their functioning, which in turn justifies the necessity of applying a differentiated approach in the process of strategic planning for the development of the regional industries.Conclusions and Relevance:the materials outlined in the article show the multifaceted nature of the process of managing the development of the regional industry, which consists in the need to take into account the different, sometimes multidirectional tendencies and interests of participants in the economic process at all levels of management, and the lack of a unified approach to strategic planning. Within the framework of a unified approach to strategic planning for the development of the regional industries, an important element is the spread of the practice of applying the synthetic classification of regions. The application of a single approach to the classification of regions contributes to a more competent formation of industrial policies of individual regions of the country and territories of Russia, and also creates opportunities for targeted planning, including the activation of activities of individual industries and industrial enterprises.
Highlights
The authors state that there is no conflict of interest, including the use of data by the Analytical Center under the Government of the Russian Federation in carrying out this study
Compiled by the authors based on materials [31,32,33]; Methods of drawing up a rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions of the company «RAEKS-Analitika»
Compiled by the authors based on materials Dynamics of industrial production: regional differences
Summary
В России стратегическое планирование социально-экономического развития регионов в условиях рыночной экономики в той или иной форме осуществлялось с 1992 года. Недостатки одна из первых обширных классификаций, послужившая основой для последующих исследований в данной сфере недостаточное внимание к душевым показателям; игнорирование различий в фондоемкости ведущих отраслей регионов, роли бюджетных инвестиций и масштабных инфраструктурных проектов яркие и в то же время глубокие комплексные описания типов регионов практически в каждом типе имеются регионы, отнесенные к нему по формальным критериям, но в реальности куда более близкие к «идеальному» портрету другого типа основным достижением классификации можно считать понимание различных целей развития, которые стоят перед разными регионами, и определение возможных векторов региональной политики при переходе на второй уровень классификации по социальным показателям происходит нарушение общей логики систематизации регионов демонстрирует наиболее глубокие линии разломов в пространственном рельефе российской экономики адаптация заложенных в классификации идей для анализа регионального измерения макроэкономической динамики требует дополнительной работы отображает действительные проблемы и перспективы развития регионов, равно как и контрасты в достигнутом уровне констатация уровня развития территории без выявления ключевого его источника, который мог бы сыграть для территории роль как фактора риска, так и факторов социально-экономической устойчивости ориентирована в первую очередь на показатели роста, на потребности инвесторов в быстром анализе основных показателей динамики, что удобно для прикладных целей детальный алгоритм расчета индексов инвестиционного рейтинга не опубликован, что формирует определенную долю недоверия к полученным результатам
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
