Abstract

Syntactic violations in sentences elicit a P600 component in the event-related potential, which is frequently interpreted as signaling reanalysis or repair of the sentence structure. However, P600 components have been reported also for semantic and combined semantic and syntactic violations, giving rise to still other interpretations. In many of these studies, the violation might be of special significance for the task of the participants; however there is a lack of studies directly targeting task effects on the P600. Here we repeated a previously published study but using a probe verification task, focusing on individual words rather than on sentence correctness and directly compared the results with the previous ones. Although a (somewhat smaller) N400 component occurred also in the present study, we did not observe a parietal P600 component. Instead, we found a late anterior negativity. Possibly, the parietal P600 observed in sentence acceptability paradigms relates to the target value of the violations or to late sentence structure-specific processes that are more task-sensitive than the N400 and which are or not initiated in the probe verification task. In any case the present findings show a strong dependency of P600-eliciting processes from attention to the sentences context whereas the N400 eliciting processes appear relatively robust.

Highlights

  • In the study of language perception, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) are useful because they provide an online record of the corresponding brain processes

  • The present study investigated whether the P600 component in the ERP, elicited by syntactic and sometimes semantic violations in sentences, depends on the task assigned to the participant

  • The present study investigated whether the P600 component to single syntactic, single semantic, and combined violations relates to the task relevance of the violating word

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the study of language perception, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) are useful because they provide an online record of the corresponding brain processes. The present study investigated whether the P600 component in the ERP, elicited by syntactic and sometimes semantic violations in sentences, depends on the task assigned to the participant. Among the growing number of linguistically relevant ERP components, three seem to be most established: the N400, LAN, and P600. The N400 is a negative-going ERP deflection between roughly 250 and 550 ms that is usually largest over central and posterior electrode sites. The N400 increases in amplitude with the difficulty to integrate the eliciting word into a context – usually a sentence – [1]. The LAN (left anterior negativity) is named after its typical scalp distribution. It shows a negative-going peak around 400 ms after a word and is typically elicited by morpho-syntactic violations It shows a negative-going peak around 400 ms after a word and is typically elicited by morpho-syntactic violations (e.g. [2])

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call