Abstract
Cultivated tetraploid potatoes ( Solanum tuberosum L.) are moderately salt sensitive but greater stress tolerance exists in diploid wild types. However, little work has been published on salt-tolerance in diploid potato. This study utilized sensitive and tolerant diploid potatoes as well as a commercially cultivated potato to investigate mechanisms of stress tolerance. Stem cuttings from salt-tolerant (T) and sensitive (S) clones of early-maturing (EM) and late-maturing (LM) diploid potato clones were stressed for 5 days at the tuber initiation stage with 150 mmol NaCl in a hydroponic sand culture under greenhouse conditions. The stress responses of the early- and late-maturing potato clones were distinctly different. Under stress, early-maturing clones accumulated Na + in the leaf tissues while late-maturing clones generally excluded Na + from the leaf tissues. Salt tolerant clones of both maturity types were able to tolerate high levels of Na + in the leaf tissues. The lower leaves accumulated more Na + than the upper leaves in both maturity types. The potassium to sodium ratio was significantly greater in the leaves of the late-maturing types, reflecting differences in Na + accumulation rather than alterations in K + levels. Proline levels increased upon salt exposure but were not clearly associated with salinity tolerance. Tolerance was manifested in maintenance of vegetative growth, tuber yield, and reduced leaf necrosis. These responses require efficient uptake of water and source–sink translocation. Maintenance of stomatal conductance under stress was not associated with these responses but tuber yield was related to lower-leaf osmotic potential (OP) in both early- and late-maturity types. Salt tolerant clones of both maturity types also had less negative tuber OP under salt stress than sensitive types. High yielding EMT and LMT clones either minimized tuber yield loss or even increased yield after exposure to salt stress. Mechanistic studies and screening experiments for salt tolerant clones should consider maturity type, leaf position and source–sink relationships enhancing tuber yield.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.