Abstract
There is a well-established negative correlation between earnings and mortality risk. Using a calibrated general-equilibrium macroeconomic model, this paper examines how this correlation interacts with the welfare implications of Social Security's benefit-earnings rule. My primary findings suggest that the welfare ranking of alternative benefit-earnings rules is somewhat sensitive to differential mortality. Due to their relatively high mortality risk, households with unfavorable earnings histories heavily discount the expected utility from old-age consumption, and therefore do not put much weight on better work-retirement consumption smoothing. Because of this reason, Social Security's benefit-earnings rule warrants less redistribution in the presence of differential mortality, compared to when mortality risk is uncorrelated to earnings. I find that this result continues to hold when household-level labor supply distortions are ignored, and also when an alternative “maximin” welfare criterion is considered, but not when accidental bequests from the deceased are redistributed to the survivors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.