Abstract

Variation within a population is a key feature in evolution, because it can increase or impede response to selection, depending on whether or not the intrapopulational variance is correlated to the change under selection. Hence, main directions of genetic variance have been proposed to constitute “lines of least resistance to evolution” along which evolution would be facilitated. Yet, the screening of selection occurs at the phenotypic level, and the phenotypic variance is not only the product of the underlying genetic variance, but also of developmental processes. It is thus a key issue for interpreting short and long term evolutionary patterns to identify whether main directions of phenotypic variance indeed constitute direction of facilitated evolution, and whether this is favored by developmental processes preferably generating certain phenotypes. We tackled these questions by a morphometric quantification of the directions of variance, compared to the direction of evolution of the first upper and lower molars of wild continental and insular house mice. The main phenotypic variance indeed appeared as channeling evolution between populations. The upper molar emerged as highly evolvable, because a strong allometric component contributed to its variance. This allometric relationship drove a repeated but independent evolution of a peculiar upper molar shape whenever size increased. This repeated evolution, together with knowledge about the molar development, suggest that the main direction of phenotypic variance correspond here to a “line of least developmental resistance” along which evolution between population is channeled.

Highlights

  • Variation within a population is a key feature in evolution, because it can increase or impede response to selection, depending on whether or not the intrapopulational variance is correlated to the change under selection [1,2,3]

  • The screening of selection occurs at the phenotypic level, and the phenotypic variance is the product of the underlying genetic variance, and of developmental processes

  • Recent advances in understanding the intricate interplay of development and evolution (‘‘evodevo’’) brought evidences that some developmental processes favor the production of certain phenotypes (e.g. [6]), channeling the course of long-term evolution into preferred directions [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Variation within a population is a key feature in evolution, because it can increase or impede response to selection, depending on whether or not the intrapopulational variance is correlated to the change under selection [1,2,3]. The direction of shape change between two populations of interest was evaluated as the difference between their mean FCs. Based on the pattern of differentiation (Fig. 2), it appears that populations from the mainland cluster as expected; they were pooled into a global mainland reference sample since the phylogeographic relationships between insular mice and their surrounding mainland relatives is unclear.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call