Abstract

On microevolutionary timescales, adaptive evolution depends upon both natural selection and the underlying genetic architecture of traits under selection, which may constrain evolutionary outcomes. Whether such genetic constraints shape phenotypic diversity over macroevolutionary timescales is more controversial, however. One key prediction is that genetic constraints should bias the early stages of species divergence along “genetic lines of least resistance” defined by the genetic (co)variance matrix, G. This bias is expected to erode over time as species means and G matrices diverge, allowing phenotypes to evolve away from the major axis of variation. We tested for evidence of this signal in West Indian Anolis lizards, an iconic example of adaptive radiation. We found that the major axis of morphological evolution was well aligned with a major axis of genetic variance shared by all species despite separation times of 20–40 million years, suggesting that divergence occurred along a conserved genetic line of least resistance. Further, this signal persisted even as G itself evolved, apparently because the largest evolutionary changes in G were themselves aligned with the line of genetic least resistance. Our results demonstrate that the signature of genetic constraint may persist over much longer timescales than previously appreciated, even in the presence of evolving genetic architecture. This pattern may have arisen either because pervasive constraints have biased the course of adaptive evolution or because the G matrix itself has been shaped by selection to conform to the adaptive landscape.

Highlights

  • Evolutionary biologists have long debated whether biodiversity is shaped mainly by natural selection or by intrinsic factors, such as genetic variation and the developmental mechanisms that translate genes into phenotype

  • The pattern we demonstrate is consistent with genetic constraints biasing evolutionary change, it is consistent with the action of natural selection simultaneously shaping traits and the genetic variation that underlies them

  • We find that two axes describe the majority of genetic variation in all seven species, and that these directions are aligned to the major axis of genetic variation in an ancestral G matrix reconstructed to represent the hypothetical pattern of ancestral genetic architecture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evolutionary biologists have long debated whether biodiversity is shaped mainly by natural selection or by intrinsic factors, such as genetic variation and the developmental mechanisms that translate genes into phenotype. The pattern we demonstrate is consistent with genetic constraints biasing evolutionary change, it is consistent with the action of natural selection simultaneously shaping traits and the genetic variation that underlies them. Genetic constraints may respond to natural selection in such a way as to facilitate further adaptive evolution Both natural selection and genetic architecture play important roles in determining the direction and magnitude of evolutionary change (Lande 1976, 1979). Adaptive evolution proceeds when natural selection favors change, and genetic architecture (i.e., the patterns of genetic variation and covariation underlying trait expression) determines whether and how traits respond to selection across generations (Lande 1979; Grant and Grant 1995). The extent to which genetic constraints influence larger scale evolutionary change, such as phenotypic divergence in species radiations, remains a major unresolved question in biology (Schluter 2000; Gould 2002)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call