Differential Coping Strategies in Response to Salinity Challenge in Olive Flounder.

Junjia Zeng,Weiqun Lu,Neill A Herbert

doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.01378

Junjia Zeng, Weiqun Lu + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01378

Copy DOI

Abstract

To examine how different fish coping strategies respond to salinity challenge, olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) with active coping style (AC) and passive coping style (PC) were transferred from seawater (SW) to freshwater (FW) and their behavior and physiology were analyzed. Different behavioral coping strategies, in terms of escape and feeding tendencies, were confirmed in AC and PC fish without FW exposure. Differences in swimming distance between AC and PC flounder were then assessed after 1 and 2 days of FW transfer. Plasma parameters and branchial gene expression were also determined 2, 5, 8, and 14 days after transfer, with comparisons between AC and PC fish and against a SW-acclimated control group. The results showed that: (1) PC flounder exhibited a significant reduction in swimming activity, while AC flounder significantly increased locomotion 2 days after transfer. (2) The plasma osmolality and plasma ionic (Na+ and Cl−) concentration of FW-acclimated PC flounder declined in a continuous fashion over time but this contrasted against the plasma parameters of AC flounder which fluctuated below the baseline level of a SW-acclimated control group. (3) The expression of NKA-α1 and NHE-3-like mRNA in PC flounder gill increased significantly from 5 days, but the expression of these two genes in AC flounder only increased after 8 days of transfer. (4) There were no remarkable differences observed in Rhcg expressions between AC and PC flounder. This study indicates for the first time that PC flounder adopt a “freeze-passive tolerance” strategy while AC flounder adopt a “flight-active resistance” defense strategy in response to salinity challenge.

Highlights

In animals, including fish, coping style is defined as a consistent individual response (CIR) to environmental challenge that is maintained over time and/or across contexts (Castanheira et al, 2017)
This study indicates for the first time that passive coping style (PC) flounder adopt a “freeze-passive tolerance” strategy while active coping style (AC) flounder adopt a “flight-active resistance” defense strategy in response to salinity challenge
The AC flounder were more motivated to feed and showed a higher tendency to escape during the confinement than PC flounder

Summary

Introduction

In animals, including fish, coping style is defined as a consistent individual response (CIR) to environmental challenge that is maintained over time and/or across contexts (Castanheira et al, 2017). The CIRs of fish in response to environmental challenges are associated with behavioral and physiological differences (Overli et al, 2007), and have increasingly been recognized as adaptive variation (Castanheira et al, 2017). Coping Strategies in Olive Flounder with different coping styles (Sloman et al, 2003, 2004, 2008; Louison et al, 2017). In common with the rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Frost et al, 2007), active coping (AC) individuals and passive coping (PC) individuals are observed in olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus (Rupia et al, 2016). During acute stress, passive coping individuals adopt a passive “freeze-hide” strategy by reducing their oxygen consumption rates and remaining immobile whereas active coping individuals adopt an active “fight-flight” defense strategy by increasing their rates of respiration and activity levels (Rupia et al, 2016)

Methods

Results

Conclusion