Different signaling responses to anti‐proliferative agents in human aortic and venous smooth muscle cells

Abstract

Proliferation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) contributes to the stenosis of coronary arteries and vascular grafts. Local delivery of anti-proliferative drugs can prevent vascular stenosis. To understand the cellular responses to anti-proliferative agents, we investigated the signaling events in cultured human aortic SMCs (ASMCs), saphenous venous SMCs (VSMCs), and dermal fibroblasts (DFs) in response to paclitaxel or etoposide. Cellular mitochondrial and proliferative activities were examined with the methylthiazoletetrazolium (MTT) dye reduction and the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assay, respectively. Cell proliferation was almost completely suppressed by paclitaxel or etoposide, but apoptosis was achieved in only about 50% of cells at the highest drug concentrations, suggesting the presence of compensatory mechanisms to prevent apoptosis. Examination of three important signaling pathways revealed significant differences between ASMCs, VSMCs, and DFs. Treatment with either paclitaxel or etoposide caused a transient phosphorylation/activation of p42 MAPK in ASMCs and DFs, but had no effect on phospho-p42/44 MAPK in VSMCs. High-dose etoposide enhanced p38 MAPK activation in ASMCs, but not in VSMCs. The p38 inhibitor, PD169316, partially inhibited etoposide-induced ASMC apoptosis, but induced apoptosis in VSMCs. The effects of etoposide and paclitaxel on Akt also differed between ASMCs and VSMCs. These observations indicate that ASMCs and VSMCs differ in the response of signaling pathways to anti-proliferative agents. In ASMCs, p42/44 MAPK appears to serve a pro-survival role, whereas p38 MAPK is a pro-apoptotic regulator. In contrast, p38 MAPK is an important pro-survival regulator in VSMCs and p42/44 MAPK appears to play a minor role in responding to anti-proliferative drugs.