Abstract

Land-use change is one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss by introducing environmental modifications, which excludes native species unable to adapt to the novel conditions. Grasslands are among the most threatened biomes; understanding the influence of different land-use types on native species is crucial to achieving sustainable management policies. We hypothesized that land-use types that partially conserve the original vegetation cover would show higher taxonomic and functional diversity and similarity with native assemblages than land-use types that replace the original vegetation cover. We compared the taxonomic and functional alpha and beta diversity of spider assemblages between soybean crops, eucalypt plantations, and cattle fields with seminatural grasslands. Through null models, we assessed the standardized effect sizes to test differences in the strength of environmental filtering among land-use types. Environmental changes introduced by different land-use types resulted in assemblages differentiated in species and trait composition, taxonomically and functionally impoverished with respect to seminatural grasslands. All land-use types drove species replacement and trait loss and replacement of grassland spiders. Each land-use showed a characteristic species and trait composition. Most of the grassland traits were not lost but were under or over-represented according to the land-use type. Only in soybean crops the formation of spider communities would be mainly driven by environmental filtering. Changes in land-use decreased species diversity and modified the composition of spider species and functional traits leading to differentiated spider assemblages. As spider species and traits varied among land-uses, a mitigation measure against grasslands biodiversity loss could be the development of productive landscapes with a mosaic of land-use types, as each of them would provide microhabitats for species with different requirements. Because land-use types mainly led to the rearrangement of grassland functional trait values, most of spider functions might be conserved in mosaics of land-use types.

Highlights

  • Land-use change is one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss by introducing environmental modifications, which excludes native species unable to adapt to the novel conditions

  • When the abiotic environment is the main selective force, environmental filtering would exclude species unable to tolerate the conditions at a given location, while those species able to survive would share common traits associated with their abiotic requirements

  • We identified the species involved in the taxonomic dissimilarity patterns by running non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) with Jaccard dissimilarity measures using vegan package of R

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Land-use change is one of the major drivers of biodiversity loss by introducing environmental modifications, which excludes native species unable to adapt to the novel conditions. Environmental changes introduced by different land-use types resulted in assemblages differentiated in species and trait composition, taxonomically and functionally impoverished with respect to seminatural grasslands. Combinations of environmental variables (i.e., new microhabitats) allowing new specific trait–environment relationships which may lead to changes In such a case, a complete replacement of species and traits should be expected if a completely different habitat is set. A complete replacement of species and traits should be expected if a completely different habitat is set Both types of changes in taxonomic or functional assemblage composition can be assessed by accounting for nestedness and turnover components of beta diversity ­estimation[8]. As environmental filtering has been proposed as the main driving force of the distribution of trait values in human-modified e­ cosystems[13], we expect different degrees in spider trait convergence or even divergence in land-use types depending on the environmental dissimilarity between the anthropic and the native habitats

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call