Differences of Three Methods in Determining Ozone Sensitivity in Nanjing

Abstract

In recent years， ozone （O3） has become an increasingly important air pollutant in China. Identifying the sensitivity of O3 to the precursors volatile organic compounds （VOCs） and nitrogen oxides （NOx） can help make effective abatement strategies. This study compared three methods for determining O3-VOCs-NOx sensitivity： simulated photochemical indicator values and sensitivity coefficients derived from a three-dimensional air quality model and an observation-based model （OBM）， with a case study involving an O3 pollution event that occurred in Nanjing in late July 2017. The results showed that O3 sensitivity based on the photochemical indicator and sensitivity coefficients demonstrated similar spatial variations （over 50% of the grid cells of Nanjing exhibiting identical O3 sensitivity）. However， sensitivity coefficients identified a larger number of areas within a transitional O3 sensitivity regime， as opposed to the VOCs- or NOx-limited regime identified by the photochemical indicator. The determination of the latter was affected by the adopted threshold values. The OBM relied on the quality of the observational data. For example， positive biases in observed NO2 could lead to an underestimation of O3 sensitivity to NOx with the OBM. During the high pollution period， the three methods exhibited significant disparities. The photochemical indicator tended to suggest the VOCs-limited condition， whereas the OBM and sensitivity coefficients indicated the NOx-limited or transitional regimes.