Differences is students' performance, (mis)calibration, and confidence judgments depending on their preferred sitting position in class

Abstract

Students who perform better academically are generally more accurate in assessing their performance. In other words, they are better calibrated, showing smaller discrepancy between their predicted and actual performance. Research into contextual variables related to performance has shown that students sitting position may be related to their performance in class. In the current study we attempted to bring several lines of research together and examine whether there are differences in academic performance, calibration, and confidence judgments among students who choose various sitting positions in the classroom.130 college students (M = 21.52, SD = 1.59; 103 female) attending courses at the University of Jaen in Spain participated. Results revealed that students' calibration differed depending on their preferred sitting position. We found that students in middle rows were optimally calibrated, students in the front rows overestimated their performance, and those in the back rows tended to underestimate their performance. Furthermore, students in the front rows were the most confident in their estimates, whereas students in the middle and back rows were less confident, suggesting the manifestation of the Dunning-Kruger effect. Future directions for contextual variables contributing to students' optimal calibration are discussed.