Abstract
Purpose Sterile inflammation along the tunneled catheter is a characteristic complication associated with trabectedin infusion via a central venous port (CVP). To date, no studies have evaluated the differences in sterile inflammation incidence according to the CVP system used. This study evaluated the differences in sterile inflammation incidence between two different CVP systems. Methods This study was conducted at The University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. Patients with trabectedin infusion using CVP via the internal jugular vein between April 2016 and February 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Sterile inflammation was characterized as skin erythema, swelling, pain, or induration along the tunneled catheter after infusion of trabectedin from the CVP and negative for various infection tests. The incidence of sterile inflammation was compared using two different CVP systems: Anthron® polyurethane catheter with Celsite port (P-U Celsite; Toray Medical, Tokyo, Japan) and DewX Eterna (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). Results Of the 21 patients, 12 and nine patients used P-U Celsite and DewX Eterna for trabectedin infusion, respectively. Sterile inflammation occurred in five patients; of these, four underwent CVP removal because of worsened pain, making trabectedin infusion difficult. Sterile inflammation occurred in 0 (0/12) and 56% (5/9) of patients using P-U Celsite and DewX Eterna, respectively, with a significantly lower incidence in patients using P-U Celsite (P = 0.006). Conclusion Sterile inflammation incidence was significantly lower in patients using P-U Celsite compared to those using DewX Eterna.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call