DIFFERENCES IN SYMPATHETIC OUTFLOW PROFILES AMONG CANDIDATES TO RENAL DENERVATION

Abstract

Objective: Renal denervation (RDN) is increasingly used to reduce sympathetic outflow and improve blood pressure (BP) control in patients with resistant or difficult-to-treat arterial hypertension. However, the BP response to the procedure is variable, and factors influencing this variability remain largely unknown. Sympathetic outflow recorded before the procedure might predict the BP response to RDN, although results from different studies remain conflicting. These discrepancies might depend on the limited characterization of the sympathetic outflow before RDN, making its better definition an important goal to refine the patient selection. Design and method: We prospectively enrolled patients with difficult-to-treat arterial hypertension undergoing RDN. Patients underwent an extensive clinical evaluation, and the muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in resting conditions and during respiratory maneuvers (controlled inspiratory apneas, evaluation of chemoreflex sensitivity to hypoxia and hypercapnia with the rebreathing technique) was recorded through microneurography. Sympathetic burst frequency, incidence, amplitude, duration and integral, as well as inter-burst interval, were calculated with a semi-automated in-house software. Results: Table 1 reports the clinical characteristics of the 10 patients that were enrolled and underwent MSNA recording before RDN. Only in 6 patients the MSNA signal was clearly interpretable and, of these, 5 subjects (Figure 1) completed the whole battery of the respiratory stimuli (2 patients couldn’t perform chemoreflex testing due to panic attack and loss of neural signal). Apnea increased the burst frequency and incidence in all patients, although the magnitude of the changes from the resting acquisition was variable. The MSNA responses to the other respiratory maneuvers were jeopardized. Burst duration remained stable, whereas an increased MSNA could be observed (subjects 1 and 3) in terms of risen burst integral and reduced inter-burst interval compared to baseline. The sympathetic response to inspiratory apneas seems mediated by chemoreflex responses in these patients. The other subjects did not show such variations. Conclusions: Respiratory maneuvers are feasible during MSNA acquisitions and unveil different patterns of sympathetic responses in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN. Such differences might be missed at rest but could represent novel predictors of the BP response to the procedure.