Abstract
It has been widely reported that there are physiological differences between twin and singleton pregnancies, as evidenced by physiological indicators examined during prenatal period. However, not all physiological indicators have been evaluated. Physiological indicators of twin pregnancies still refer to the standards of single pregnancies and lack precise variation intervals. Therefore, our study compared and analyzed the differences in physiological indicators between twin and singleton pregnancies. Retrospective cohort data of deliveries at Peking University Third Hospital from January 1, 2012, to February 8, 2021, were utilized. Information of pregnant women, including maternal characteristics, 49 physiological indicators examined during four periods (postpartum, first, second, and third trimester), and pregnancy complications, was extracted from medical records. Mann-Whitney test and multiple linear regressions were conducted to evaluate the differences in physiological indicators between twin and singleton pregnancies and to demonstrate their variation trend throughout gestation. A total of 40 746 cases were included (38 320 singleton pregnancy cases and 2426 twin pregnancy cases). In twin pregnancies, 16 indicators related to red blood cells, platelets, coagulation function, protein, creatinine, and blood lipids exhibited distinctions compared to singleton pregnancies throughout gestation. The results remained stable regardless of maternal complications. Twin and singleton pregnancies are in distinct physiological conditions. It is of great necessity to establish specific reference intervals for twin pregnancies. Further study is needed to investigate the impact of physiological indicators on predicting adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
