Abstract

The effect of working experience on lifting strengths for males had been verified by Chen et al. (2011). This paper extends that study to compare the lifting strengths and the postures at various exertion heights between experienced workers and novices among Taiwanese females. Forty-six experienced workers and novices (23 of each) were recruited and were required to determine their static-lifting strengths under various height levels (10∼150 cm in increments of 10 cm) using two exertion methods (vertically upward lifting, VUL, and toward body lifting, TBL). Results showed that the VUL forces were much higher than the TBL at 15 height positions (p < 0.001). At lower heights (50 cm), workers’ VUL forces were 5.67-7.40 kg higher than novices’ and no differences were found in TBL at these heights (less than 2 kg). A reverse trend was found when lifting ranges were equal to or higher than 90 cm. Forces in all 30 task combinations showed no difference between the two groups at heights of 60-80 cm. Workers’ strengths under all 15 lifting heights showed a relatively small fluctuation compared to novices’ and they tended to adopt a fully squat and a more erect posture at lower and higher heights, respectively. The results suggested that lifting strength data generally collected on students should be carefully used in the task design.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.