Abstract

Chryseobacterium infections are uncommon, and previous studies have revealed that Chryseobacterium gleum is frequently misidentified as Chryseobacterium indologenes We aimed to explore the differences in clinical manifestations and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns between C. gleum and C. indologenes The database of a clinical microbiology laboratory was searched to identify patients with Chryseobacterium infections between 2005 and 2017. Species were reidentified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and patients with C. gleum and C. indologenes infections were included in the study. A total of 42 C. gleum and 84 C. indologenes isolates were collected from consecutive patients. A significant increase in C. indologenes incidence was observed. C. gleum was significantly more associated with bacteremia than C. indologenes Patients with C. gleum infections had more comorbidities of malignancy and liver cirrhosis than those with C. indologenes infections. The overall case fatality rate was 19.8%. Independent risk factors for mortality were female sex and C. indologenes infection. These isolates were most susceptible to minocycline (73%), followed by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (47.6%), tigecycline (34.1%), and levofloxacin (32.5%). C. gleum exhibited a significantly higher rate of susceptibility than C. indologenes to piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, tigecycline, and levofloxacin. Alterations in DNA gyrase subunit A were identified to be associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in C. indologenes No nonsynonymous substitutions were observed in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of C. gleum Differences in epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns exist between C. gleum and C. indologenes Additional investigations are needed to explore the significance of these differences.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call