Abstract

Access to resources is a dynamic and multicausal process that determines the success and survival of a population. It is therefore often challenging to disentangle the factors affecting ecological traits like diet. Insular habitats provide a good opportunity to study how variation in diet originates, in particular in populations of mesopredators such as lizards. Indeed, high levels of population density associated with low food abundance and low predation are selection pressures typically observed on islands. In the present study, the diet of eighteen insular populations of two closely related species of lacertid lizards (Podarcis sicula and Podarcis melisellensis) was assessed. Our results reveal that despite dietary variability among populations, diet taxonomic diversity is not impacted by island area. In contrast, however, diet disparity metrics, based on the variability in the physical (hardness) and behavioral (evasiveness) properties of ingested food items, are correlated with island size. These findings suggest that an increase in intraspecific competition for access to resources may induce shifts in functional components of the diet. Additionally, the two species differed in the relation between diet disparity and island area suggesting that different strategies exist to deal with low food abundance in these two species. Finally, sexual dimorphism in diet and head dimensions is not greater on smaller islands, in contrast to our predictions.

Highlights

  • Access to resources in ecosystems and communities is a dynamic and multicausal process that determines the success and survival of a population

  • The present study aims to characterize the diversity of diet across insular populations of two closely related species of lacertid lizards: seven populations of Podarcis sicula (Rafinesque‐Schmaltz, 1810) and eleven of Podarcis melisellensis (Braun, 1877)

  • Our results show that (a) a male‐based sexual dimorphism in head dimensions and diet exists, (b) that the intensity of dimorphism in head dimensions does not correlate with that in diet, suggesting that it is primarily driven by sexual selection, and (c) that the intensity of dimorphism is not amplified on the smallest islands, suggesting that if increased intraspecific competition is occurring on small islets, this likely results in both sexes occupying different microhabitats

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Access to resources in ecosystems and communities is a dynamic and multicausal process that determines the success and survival of a population. Not all organisms show this, most vertebrate taxa do, especially lizards (Case, 1975; Pérez‐Mellado et al, 2008; Schoener, 1989) which have been shown to drastically increase their population density when the diversity in species within the community decreases In this sense, insular populations diverge from their mainland relatives by displaying a higher ratio between intraspecific and interspecific competition (Itescu, Schwarz, Meiri, & Pafilis, 2017; Pafilis, Meiri, Foufopoulos, & Valakos, 2009). Previous studies have suggested that intraspecific competition for resource access can increase variation in diet within insular populations (Svanbäck & Bolnick, 2007) This is likely the case because ecological release promotes morphological variation enabling animals to exploit novel food resources (Thomas et al, 2009). The populations included in the present study live on islands of very diverse size, structure, and vegetation cover that all may impact population density and food

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
| CONCLUSION
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call