Abstract
Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGSe) solar cells are among the most efficient thin‐film solar cells on lab scale. However, this thin‐film technology has relatively large upscaling losses for commercial technology. To tackle this, paradigm shifts are proposed that allow for simpler, cost‐effective, and efficient CIGSe solar cells. Front passivation using dielectric layers is one of the options being investigated as this is widely used in Si technology. Research on front passivation for CIGSe is in an early stage and no improvements are made yet. A close comparison with silicon technology is made to understand why it seems to be more difficult for CIGSe solar cells. In general, chemical passivation is less effective, resulting in higher interface defect densities than seen for Si. Also, field‐effect passivation requires positive charges, which have not been implemented yet on the CIGSe front surface. Finally, for Si passivation, often a high‐temperature annealing step is applied, which is not possible for CIGSe. It is proposed to apply a dielectric tunneling layer with positive fixed charges in combination with an electron transport layer to move forward. A list of potential dielectric layers that could be suitable for CIGSe is provided.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
