Abstract
Como pesquisadores acadêmicos nós gastamos uma quantidade substancial de tempo avaliando artigos para periódicos científicos. Embora não seja tão importante quanto publicar nossa própria pesquisa, a qualidade de nosso trabalho como avaliadores é importante, tanto para nossa profissão quanto para nosso sucesso como acadêmicos. Esta nota apresenta algumas sugestões para escrever um bom parecer de avaliação.
Highlights
As research academics we spend a substantial amount of time reviewing papers for scholarly journals
This note presents some suggestions for writing good referee reports
The public benefit for the profession is that feedback from referees helps us to do research that better
Summary
As research academics we spend a substantial amount of time reviewing papers for scholarly journals. Not that anyone likes being rejected by a journal, but it would be great if the author would find the report so valuable for the research going forward, that it turned the pain of rejection into a positive experience. If the recommendation is to revise and resubmit, a gold standard report provides explicit, feasible advice on how the author should improve the ultimate impact of the paper on the profession and the paper’s contribution to knowledge
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call