Diagnostic Performance of Attenuation-Corrected Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until March 2015 for studies evaluating AC MPI for the diagnosis of CAD. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. For each study, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of AC versus non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) MPI. A bivariate mixed-effects model was applied for pooling the data. Of 201 articles, 17 studies (1,701 patients) were identified, including 5 studies that used CT AC, 12 studies that used radionuclide source AC (RAC), and 15 studies that reported NAC results. The pooled sensitivities across studies were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.91), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.85) for CT AC, RAC, all AC, and NAC, respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85), and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74). Both sensitivities and specificities resulted in a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 20 (95% CI, 12-34), 24 (95% CI, 13-43), 22 (95% CI, 13-35), and 9 (7-11). Significant differences in specificity and diagnostic odds ratios were noted when AC (including CT AC, RAC, and all AC) was compared with NAC. The results from this study suggested that AC should be applied to MPI to improve the diagnosis of CAD, especially the specificity.