Abstract

Cervical elastography has been used in pregnant women to diagnose preterm births. However, there is a variability in the measured elasticity parameters and imaging mode used. We evaluated the precision of cervical elastography in identifying preterm births. Extensive and methodical searches were made in the databases such as Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed Central, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from the inception until November 2022, for studies that report diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography for preterm deliveries in antenatal women. The pooled sensitivity and specificity value of cervical elastography for preterm deliveries were 82% (95%CI: 73%-89%) and 77% (95%CI: 64%-86%), respectively with area under curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.72-0.95). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 15 (95%CI: 8-28), positive likelihood ratio (LRP) was 3.5 (95%CI: 2.3-5.5) and negative likelihood ratio LRN was 0.23 (0.16-0.34). Pooled sensitivity and specificity of shear wave elastography was 88% and 71%, respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of strain elastography was 80% and 79%, respectively. Heterogeneity was significant, as indicated by chi-square test and an I2 statistic of over 75. Cervical elastography can be used for predicting preterm deliveries with moderate to high level of accuracy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.